LTHForum.com

Our delivery guy was literally running, he said some website had made them insanely busy
It is currently Sun May 19, 2013 11:31 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

The Trenchermen or Au Cheval?
The Trenchermen 57%  57%  [ 8 ]
Au Cheval 43%  43%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 14
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:50 am
Posts: 1
Planning on going to one or the other for my wife's birthday...

Any quick takes on this?

Thanks!


Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 20, 2011 8:34 am
Posts: 4
Au Cheval, hands down! I have been to the trencherman and my boyfriend has been there twice, it is awful. In fact, here is his write up of his two experiences there and I do not plan to go back.

http://www.chicagonow.com/chicago-food-snob/2012/08/trenchermen-extraordinarily-under-classed/#image/1
Au Cheval is fantastic, burger is one of the best I have had and the environment is just fun, but loud. Go early or late as there are no reservations.

Have fun.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:21 am
Posts: 199
au cheval's no reservation policy means you're probably better off at trencherman for special event type dining.

AC is pretty small too, so it's not particularly comfortable to wait in.

FWIW i've enjoyed both places.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 417
I haven't been to the Trenchermen yet but the burger at Au Cheval is the closest thing Chicago has to a Shake Shack burger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 174
DutchMuse wrote:
I haven't been to the Trenchermen yet but the burger at Au Cheval is the closest thing Chicago has to a Shake Shack burger.


Is that a compliment or a takedown?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:52 am
Posts: 2591
Location: W. Lakeview
I really enjoyed The Trenchermen and it was great for celebrating a friend's birthday. Pretty space, great service from bar to table and the food was terrific. Au Cheval was good, VERY heavy food, attitude laden service and an uncomfortable space. Good for late night dining on hangover food--not a place I would go for an occasion.

_________________
“The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be pretty sure they’re going to have some pretty annoying virtues.” Elizabeth Taylor


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:55 am
Posts: 6
I love Au Cheval and really disliked Trenchermen. Trenchermen's space is nice and the food concepts inventive, but everything fell flat and I was extremely disappointed by it. That said, Au Cheval is more of a "diner" and the music can be really loud so if you are shooting for something more romantic, that may not be the place to go.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 417
jfibro wrote:
DutchMuse wrote:
I haven't been to the Trenchermen yet but the burger at Au Cheval is the closest thing Chicago has to a Shake Shack burger.


Is that a compliment or a takedown?


Oh, its a profound compliment. Have you had a Shack burger?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 417
Some major love for the Au Cheval burger from Bon Appetit:

http://www.bonappetit.com/blogsandforum ... -chev.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:35 pm
Posts: 168
I almost voted for Trencherman, even though I think the food at Au Cheval is incredible, but Au Cheval can be sceney, crowded, and loud. But some of the menu is downright divine. Trencherman is a nicer space and probably more convenient. I thought the food was good, but I really liked the cocktails.

_________________
- melissa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2011 2:22 pm
Posts: 51
My experience says Trencherman, however, based on the wildly divergent opinions on Trencherman my feeling is that it can be wildly inconsistent. I though it was a fantastic meal and I do notice a general theme that the earlier you go the better people seem to fare. Not sure if their kitchen is understaffed or what but most of the complaints i have seen seem to speak to them consistently getting deep in the weeds as the night goes on and the attention to detail suffering.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 7:59 am
Posts: 3
DutchMuse wrote:
jfibro wrote:
DutchMuse wrote:
I haven't been to the Trenchermen yet but the burger at Au Cheval is the closest thing Chicago has to a Shake Shack burger.


Is that a compliment or a takedown?


Oh, its a profound compliment. Have you had a Shack burger?


Really? I was wholly unimpressed with Shake Shack at both locations I visited (UES and Midtown West). I suppose it's better than most of what's out there, but if I'm going to wait in a line like that, it needs to be better than a basic burger with lettuce and tomato on a Wonder bun. It's also pretty pricey for what you get. I really think it's only marginally better than Five Guys.

I haven't been to Au Cheval yet, so I'll be sure to check out the burger and see for myself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 4:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:29 pm
Posts: 417
DutchMuse wrote:
jfibro wrote:
DutchMuse wrote:
I haven't been to the Trenchermen yet but the burger at Au Cheval is the closest thing Chicago has to a Shake Shack burger.


Is that a compliment or a takedown?


Oh, its a profound compliment. Have you had a Shack burger?


Really? I was wholly unimpressed with Shake Shack at both locations I visited (UES and Midtown West). I suppose it's better than most of what's out there, but if I'm going to wait in a line like that, it needs to be better than a basic burger with lettuce and tomato on a Wonder bun. It's also pretty pricey for what you get. I really think it's only marginally better than Five Guys.

I haven't been to Au Cheval yet, so I'll be sure to check out the burger and see for myself.[/quote]

*******************

My reply:

Of course, your opinion is quite valid for you, but apparently a lot of people disagree with you--those who wait in line for over 1 1/2 hours at Shake Shack in Madison Square Park. (There's even a Shack cam online to show how long the line is). Also, its not a Wonder bun--its a Martin's hamburger potato bun. http://aht.seriouseats.com/archives/201 ... -test.html

It might surprise you, but I'm told the Au Cheval burger was inspired by the Shack burger.


Last edited by DutchMuse on Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:50 pm
Posts: 1023
Location: Chi to NY
Yeah, the Shake Shack burger is pretty damn good, and this coming from someone who by default detests all things "iconic" in New York. Comparing their burger to Five Guys' is like comparing Basil Hayden to Evan Williams. Not even close.

_________________
"By the fig, the olive..." Surat Al-Teen, Mecca 95:1"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:45 am
Posts: 183
Trencherman or Storefront Co.??


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: imsscott, marothisu and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group