d4v3 wrote:
At any rate, I am strectching the metaphor way too thin, but doesn't the same continuity of a cultural timeline apply to restaurants? Would we really want a Trotter's that was not "pickled"in 1990, but was instead indistinguishable from a myriad of more contemporary restaurants? At what point does it become an iconic "classic", representing an important point in culinary history?
It's certainly different with restaurants because they keep performing, as opposed to movies because those are frozen in time (Star Wars notwithstanding). While I continue to think the negativity around supposedly dated dishes is not pertinent, I do believe that is different than continuing to execute at the highest level. Based on my last visit to CT about one year ago, I have to say that CT does not, and they should take a hit because of that. IMHO, I don't think CT's business downturn was a result of his supposedly dated menu as much as it was a steady stream of mediocre executions over the years that lead people to decide to spend their high-end dining dollars elsewhere.