trs23 wrote:
They probably made the changes because people would order a non and alcoholic pairing and then share.
We would be reasonable and not empty the bottle but as experienced next diners we knew the danger of sprinting out of the gate.
I'd done that on prior menus at the suggestion of the server, and I'd been thrilled with the results...I felt as if I enjoyed a nice combination of alcoholic drinks and non-alcoholic drinks, without over-indulging, but while receiving the appropriate value for what I paid.
Honestly, I suspect Next realized that their traditional pairing provided too much alcohol--true, in my mind--and they felt as if they needed to find a way to give the average person a more manageable amount. Because Next refuses to sell a la carte drinks, many of us found an alternate solution: Split an alcoholic and a non-alcoholic pairing. But once you've conditioned people to do that, if you suddenly change the rules--lesser volume for the same price--it's almost inevitable that people will feel disappointed.
I don't want to make too big of a deal about it. I realize that I was there on the first night of a new menu, which is admittedly a work in progress. Maybe they hadn't gotten all of the pairings figured out yet, maybe they were testing the pacing of the beverage service, maybe my section of the dining room was simply an anomaly. (Frankly, I noticed some other inconsistencies that I haven't seen at Next before, and that I'd assume were occurring because of the menu changeover.) Before drawing too many conclusions, I'll be interested to hear what others experience in the coming weeks.