stevez wrote:
Cynthia wrote:
stevez wrote:
No. Not the same at all, but exactly the same misuided stance in revese.
So there's absolutely nothing in the world that you think should appear on a list of "50 best" that isn't already on this list? You agree with it completely? Then that's lovely. In my case, the list leaves out a few things I'd very much consider in the top 50. But we all have different passions in the food world.
Besides, isn't it generally considered that the whole point of creating "best" lists is to get people talking about what was left out?
No Cynthia. I no more agree with that list than I did with Plotnicki's stance that only French food counts. Both are ridiculous.
Then I'm not certain at all what you were taking exception to in my comment. I suggested two things I thought ought to be added to a list of most delicious foods. I made no statements about all food having to be French or any other ethnicity. I thought suggesting a couple of additions was pretty reasonable.
Your comment about Plotnicki's "stance that only French food counts" is even more baffling, since the post to which you link is talking about Indian food, not French.
So I have no idea what you're talking about -- I didn't say it should all be French -- and I didn't say the opposite, that nothing should be French.
And of course the list is ridiculous. But, as I said earlier, such lists are generally designed to get people talking about what should have been on the list.
_________________
"Nothing important is easy." Patrick White (Australian Nobel laureate)
http://waltzingaustralia.wordpress.com