gleam wrote:
I'm posting here partly to tell jimswside that he should post his opinion without worrying about other people attacking it (don't take it personally), just because all information is worthwhile
thanks for calling me out...
ok, first off I have no axe to grind with Chucks, etc. I just didnt enjoy my 2 visits on back to back weeks this past fall. Its nothing personal & I respect others opinions as well as the board consensus.
I guess I was just disappointed with my experience @ Chucks after being blown away by every other GNR I had visited & have visited since(I think I am at 23 +/- visited in the last year or so). With how much I like food(typically I think about my visits with anticipation for the days leading up to any GNR visit), and how far I drive on the weekends or worknights to try these places(often 90+ miles each way) I had gotten used to setting the bar pretty high for any restaurant holding the GNR staus, so perhaps this is my problem/hangup/own issue.
I researched Chucks on the net and read everything I could, I read about his studying bbq, working for Bayless, etc. So I was excited to have this place within striking distance of my work which other than the row of Chinese places on Ogden Ave from Westmont to Lisle does not have much to offer. So I went for lunch and came away liking the hot link I tried, and not liking the ribs(I figured if a restaurant touts its ribs as the best in the city they should be decent.). The ribs didnt taste smoked, and there was not a smoke ring. My guest had the catfish, and chicken tenders, and they were perectly fried. I also thought the Brunswick stew was good as well as the Mac-n-cheese. Hardly a scathing review, but I just was not impressed.
So I went the next week thinking I had missed something, and decided on the cajun blackened ribeye with etouffee (supposedly a chucks special), as well as a bowl of red. The Bowl of red was excellent, but not a destination type dish at least for me(I am more of a chili dog guy vs a bowl of chili guy, once again diffeent strokes). The steak was where the problem was, I know Chucks isnt a steakhouse, and I was not expecting it to be, but cooking a steak to order isnt that hard. I wanted my steak medium rare, it came beyond well done, and the cut was fatty even for a ribeye( I drive 20 minutes each way to Chucks on lunch so I did not have time to send it back, otherwise I would have been late getting back from lunch). The etouffee sauce was pretty good, dark, and flavorfull. However serving this selection with a baked potato is odd to say the least. Give me an order of white rice, or even some dirty rice, and if they could get the steak right it would be a winner. Once again that is one persons opinion about an entrees starch choice, and me having an issue as a former line/broiler cook with the inability to cook a steak to order.
I can see how there could be a comfort factor with Chucks for people who live in the proximity, so I guess I can see the neighborhood aspect, and allure of Chuck's. If the board believes Chucks to be a GNR I respect that & wish Chucks good fortune, I am just providing another data point.
I've said my peace & final comments about Chucks, let me have it.

* post edited for grammar, and spelling goof-ups *