David Hammond wrote:
Binko wrote:
David Hammond wrote:
Okay, consider this. You made the comment about liking Old Style sometimes, which I get, but that you normally drink better beers.
Not quite. I said I normally drink microbrews. I prefer more malt and more hops in my beer, but I'm not saying they're somehow objectively better.
Because you
couldn't say they're objectively better, right, because there is no such thing as objectivity in food judgements, right?
I've been thinking a lot about this conversation today, and I've come to conclusion that one reason some of us seek out authenticity in food (aside from our very real anthropological interest in foodways) is that it permits us to talk about food in a way that skirts evaluation (aside from vague statements about "deliciousness," etc.).
We do, however, tacitly or overtly subscribe to the belief that some foods are "better" than others. For instance, if I were arguing with a person who told me that a Kraft single is every bit as good a piece of cheese as, say, a slice of Pleasant Ridge Reserve, I'd say, "Sir (or Madam), you are incorrect. You may like the Kraft single, and you're entitled to your opinion, but it is not even cheese as I understand the term. You may prefer the Kraft single because your mom served it to you after school, and you have understandably warm memories of that, but this cheese food from Kraft is not as good, not anywhere near as good as this delicious slice of Wisconsin farmstead cheese." And I would not feel compelled to add the wishy-washy "In my opinion" or a "gosh, you know, that's just how I feel and I could be wrong."
I don't want to be TOO relativist, but, no, I wouldn't compare Kraft and Pleasant Ridge. The former, as you say, is not a cheese. Kraft is fine as a prepared cheese product, and I will not accept anything else (except maybe Velveeta) when I'm making a grilled cheese sandwich. And, no, I would never have the gall to tell somebody that the only reason they like Kraft Singles is some bit of nostalgia. That's condescending as hell.
Judge to style and to expectations. Have you never recommended a place you actively dislike because you thought somebody else would like it? Maybe you're not like me, but I generally try to get a sense of a person's taste before recommending anything, unless they actually want to know what I consider good food. For example, if I know somebody likes fall-off-the-bone ribs, I'll send them to Gale Street Inn. You will never find me eating their ribs, I don't understand how anybody in their right mind could like that gelatinous, gooey crap, but they do. Like I said, who am I to say. So I send people their way, they come back with rave reviews, and then I might mention that I actually don't like those ribs (in nice terms), but I figured it might suit their tastes. That's the fun part of recommending food for me--trying to figure out what people might like, even if their tastes are 180 degrees from yours, and succeeding in it. Part of that requires a bit of empathy and the ability to imagine why somebody might like gelatinous, gooey ribs. Despite me saying I don't understand it, I could see what people like in it. Just like I hate Burger King with the fire of a thousand suns, I get that some people like that faux-smoke flavor to them.