Cathy2 wrote:
I even like the formula:
1) Chef Ramsey meets the staff, then sits down to lunch.
2) He observes the kitchen in action and the dinner service. If he observes an issue, then he may close down the restaurant. (At least you didn't have a shutdown, which would have been quite a sideshow in itself.)
3) He inspects the kitchen often finding some serious sanitation issues. Of course the most disgusting, moldy food always seems to be a component of his lunch. He is furious he could have taken ill or died from their food.
4) Sit down with the staff and owners to give his birdseye view of their poor performance.
5) Restaurant closes while being retooled.
6) Everything begins with a good scrub of the kitchen. He then analyzes the restaurant's market position, reviews the menu's responsiveness to market realities and deals with staff relations. Often the restaurant redirects its target audience, menu overhauled to reflect new strategy and overhauls the decor to reflect the fresh approach.
7) First meal service is pretty harried. If the restaurant was operating at half-steam before, the kitchen and front of the house staff isn't used to being very busy. Whatever staff kinks haven't been worked out, then they become very apparent. The post meal review of this first service can be quite confrontational because a lot of energy and emotion was riding on it.

Once staff culture issues are resolved and restaurant is starting to get back on track. A vibrant publicity opportunity is cooked up: this may be a parade or inviting local celebrities to dine. They may also sponsor a public event like a 5K run with the restaurant front and center.
9) (Like a 60's sci-fi show) The fate of the restaurant is returned to the owners and staff. Everyone thanks the Chef for his efforts, which was really hard won praise.
10) An update sometime in the future to see how the restaurant has progressed. One smart family used this turnaround to sell their restaurant.
I like the show, too. I had no idea they were in LaGrange. Cathy2's recitation of the formula for this program seems to be fairly accurate. However, I might add the following after point no. 2 (point 2(a), perhaps):
2(a) One member of the staff -- generally the manager, an owner, or even the chef himself -- is villianized and becomes the primary target of much of Chef Ramsey's verbal abuse and humiliation (occasionally bordering on physical confrontation). This individual is embroiled in a tense, heated ongoing confrontation with Chef Ramsey throughout much of the episode. However, in the end, this person (typically) realizes the error of his or her ways, repents, and everyone is happy.
This formula seems pretty predictable from episode to episode -- but it remains entertaining (I really am a fan of the show).
As for Cafe 36, I had always heard pretty good things about it. I believe it received a fairly nice write-up from Phil Vettel a few years back. Sounds like there have been some ups and downs, though.