LTH Home

Restaurants/bars - post Covid-19

Restaurants/bars - post Covid-19
  • Forum HomePost Reply BackTop
  • Restaurants/bars - post Covid-19

    Post #1 - April 25th, 2020, 3:53 pm
    Post #1 - April 25th, 2020, 3:53 pm Post #1 - April 25th, 2020, 3:53 pm
    Ward Eight posted a link to a great piece in the New York Times Magazine from the owner of Prune, an East Village restaurant. The article title sums it up perfectly: My restaurant was my life for 20 years. Does the world need it anymore?

    I would say yes, the world needs it. I don't know how many places will be able to survive if capacity needs to be cut to accommodate social distancing. Scary times.
    -Mary
  • Post #2 - April 25th, 2020, 4:18 pm
    Post #2 - April 25th, 2020, 4:18 pm Post #2 - April 25th, 2020, 4:18 pm
    I read that piece too (it was posted in their op-ed section midweek). I thought it was great, capturing the voice of Bourdain, fed up with the pretension of the dining turned "hospitality" industry.

    People who got into the business for the ostensibly "right reasons" even as recently as a decade ago (2 decades in the author's case), when soberly analyzing the decision of whether to try and hang on through the shutdown, may realize that the passion that drove them then just doesn't fit the industry anymore. Dining is hardly unique to this, but the more every molecule and millisecond becomes an opportunity for monetization and specialization, the further removed it becomes from its original core purpose.

    People aren't going to magically wake-up one day and accept paying double current prices so restaurateurs can return to the margins of 25 years ago. You're left with an industry that is a guaranteed loser for most of its participants economically, that has lost a lot of the genuine community appeal which was a reason to be idealistic and look past the economic risk.
  • Post #3 - April 28th, 2020, 9:51 am
    Post #3 - April 28th, 2020, 9:51 am Post #3 - April 28th, 2020, 9:51 am
    A lot of the places I frequent are, quite frankly, unpopular. Like even during the busiest of times there are just a handful of people eating there. I wonder how the places that were getting by while always nearly empty will turn out.
  • Post #4 - April 28th, 2020, 10:22 am
    Post #4 - April 28th, 2020, 10:22 am Post #4 - April 28th, 2020, 10:22 am
    this, but chicago!
    imagine randolph row closed to cars! milwaukee avenue ditto! streetcafes for everyone in the open air and sunlight, with space. and temporary measure in summer to nurture the industry and our city.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... SApp_Other
  • Post #5 - May 3rd, 2020, 9:28 am
    Post #5 - May 3rd, 2020, 9:28 am Post #5 - May 3rd, 2020, 9:28 am
    Yesterday- I saw The Future of Post Covid 19 eateries.

    On a rather remote stretch of Augusta Street- closer to Oak Park than Oak Street Beach exists a corner Auto Repair Facility, that most likely you've never paid attention to.
    ImagePost-Covid19-“Restaurant”-Mexican Street Food sold from an Auto Repair Shop in an Industrial Area of Chicago’s West Side by R. Kramer, on Flickr

    The taco's are served to order.
    Some of the Rotisserie Al Pastor Meat is sliced and "held"- due to low volumes this past Saturday.
    You can request- "Dorrado"- or crispier bits of protein.
    The Salsas are amazing.
    A Green that's is much like a Smooth Peruvian Green Sauce.
    A Red Salsa- that's utterly smoky and chipotle-like in it's flavoring.
    ImageStreet Food in a Auto Repair Garage on Chicago’s far West Side by R. Kramer, on Flickr


    This....is an example of
    just how INDUSTRIOUS folks of some Cultures
    (typically-Mexico & Central America as an example) are.

    Situated in a "portico" section,
    of a Corner Mechanic/Auto Repair Shop-
    ImagePost-Covid19-“Restaurant”-Mexican Street Food sold from an Auto Repair Shop in an Industrial Area of Chicago’s West Side by R. Kramer, on Flickr

    in a Post-Industrial Area of Chicago's Far-West Side-
    a few blocks from a now shuttered "Buyers-Flea Market" on West Division Street-
    a lady and her kids- set out to share her version of Mexican Street Tacos-
    on the Trompo / Rotisserie
    "Al Pastor" & Carne Asada tacos- that are sublime, especially while consumed- "Al Trunko" (eaten on the trunk of your Automobile!)

    Saturdays and Sundays only
    No Picnic Tables (Covid 19) :(
    Tacos al Pastor
    y
    Carne Asada
    too.
    $2.25 each
    La Morena's
    Augusta & Kolmar
    Chicago,IL

    Saturdays and Sundays- Only
    Last edited by Hombre de Acero on May 3rd, 2020, 11:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
  • Post #6 - May 3rd, 2020, 10:03 am
    Post #6 - May 3rd, 2020, 10:03 am Post #6 - May 3rd, 2020, 10:03 am
    Hombre de Acero wrote:Street Food in a Auto Repair Garage on Chicago’s far West Side

    Very cool!

    Been gone a few years, there was a hot dog stand in an auto repair shop on the far edge of N Elston Ave. So-so hot dogs, still cool. I've seen a few other examples, though my brain has slowed down to the pace of a snail working its way though a butter, garlic, parsley moat.
    One minute to Wapner.
    Raymond Babbitt

    Low & Slow
  • Post #7 - May 3rd, 2020, 11:35 am
    Post #7 - May 3rd, 2020, 11:35 am Post #7 - May 3rd, 2020, 11:35 am
    I've seen a few other examples,
    Gary- do you recall an IRAQi (or possibly Assyrian) fellow way up North on Clark Street north of Devon? that also had a Auto-Repair-Garage-cum-Kebab-and-Pita-Enterprise going on for a while?

    Like you- I've had an amazing amount of
    "Hard-Drive"-Space-utilized in my smaller capacity Cranium-
    (older, pre-Solid State Technology :lol: :roll: !) that prevents me from remembering specifics of Food-and Establishments-
    but- I feel that as we come through this Viral Invasion- we will likely see plenty more
    low-overhead-Food-Establishments-
    or ones that model themselves after "The Art of Dosa"-
    before he did the Revival-Food Hall-
    which was solely based-on-Uber-Eats/DoorDash/Delivery,
    and an occasional-
    pick up-(like me)
    all- out of a non-descript- Industrial Food-Prep-Warehouse on Chicago's West Side.
  • Post #8 - May 3rd, 2020, 3:05 pm
    Post #8 - May 3rd, 2020, 3:05 pm Post #8 - May 3rd, 2020, 3:05 pm
    G Wiv wrote:I've seen a few other examples . . .

    One of my favorites was Ethel’s, a long-gone soul food restaurant in a car wash, way south on Vincennes. I remember Ethel telling me, "When business gets slow, we send out the pig."

    pasted image 0.png
  • Post #9 - May 25th, 2020, 10:01 am
    Post #9 - May 25th, 2020, 10:01 am Post #9 - May 25th, 2020, 10:01 am
    A sobering but realistic take from Steve Chapman at the Trib's site earlier this week . . .

    at chicagotribune.com, Steve Chapman wrote:When the Wisconsin Supreme Court struck down the governor’s stay-at-home order, several bars and restaurants immediately reopened, and customers came. At some, patrons thronged in, shunning masks and social distancing. On the following weekend, the resort town of Lake Geneva attracted a horde of tourists eager to eat, drink and mingle with others.

    The implication was clear: Americans are tired of isolation and are unafraid of getting sick. If we lift the restrictions that have shut down so many of these places, people will go back to doing what they used to do.

    But will they? I doubt it. The images from Wisconsin don’t give a reliable picture of what life will be like once establishments can welcome customers back inside.

    It’s not surprising that those who resent the stay-at-home order would rush out to celebrate its end. It’s not surprising that Lake Geneva would get carloads of visitors who have spent past weekends there. But a burst of business from pent-up demand is not likely to last. A relatively small group of devil-may-care types won’t show up every night or at every place that reopens.

    I had a restaurant reservation the weekend of March 14-15, before a single state had shut down. But everyone in our party of four agreed that the hazards of dining out were too much to justify. So we stayed away. So did others. The reservation system OpenTable reported that by then restaurant bookings were down 42% from a year earlier.

    There are people who would be happy to eat out or sit at a bar during a pandemic. But unlike going to the grocery or pharmacy to get essential supplies, it’s not something everyone has to do. If you’re tired of cooking, you can get takeout from your favorite place and enjoy an excellent chef-prepared meal without inhaling other people’s droplets. In some places, you can even get cocktails to go.

    The experience we so fondly remember is not what we can expect in the foreseeable future. Half the appeal of sitting down in a bistro or tavern is enjoying the noise of social engagement, the distraction from worries and the warmth of a convivial crowd. But widely spaced tables and bar stools, masked servers and the lurking threat of contagion will dampen the atmosphere.

    Premium coffee shops face a similar problem. One of the attractions of Starbucks is being amid strangers in a cozy refuge that allows both privacy and proximity. “Surround coffee with an experience and you can charge $5 a cup,” Joe Pine, co-author of “The Experience Economy,” told The New York Times.

    But will people be so eager to spend money to be around others who may be shedding the virus? Is the escape likely to be more calming or nerve-wracking? The new conditions may be tolerable, but people generally don’t go out in hopes of having a tolerable time.

    People who really want to go back to their familiar haunts, like those patrons in Wisconsin, can probably put the risk out of their minds, with the aid of alcohol. But not most of us. A Morning Consult poll this month found that only 18% of adults would feel comfortable eating in a restaurant. Compare that with 2017, when 61% dined out at least once a week.

    Outdoor seating, which appears to be less risky, is one alternative, as reflected in Gov. J.B. Pritzker’s plan to allow it to resume May 29. (Mayor Lori Lightfoot says Chicago will have to wait until sometime in June.) But alfresco dining is always at the mercy of the weather, and it’s not an enticing option in much of the country for several months of the year. A lot of establishments lack the space for it.

    Even customers who would disregard the risks of dining inside may not want to spend the money. A surge of unemployment and a dismal economic outlook are good reasons to cut back on luxuries. If you lose your job, you don’t have much discretionary income. If you fear losing your job, you’ll want to conserve your money.

    Between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2009, during the Great Recession, about 4,000 U.S. restaurants went out of business. The downturn forced Starbucks to close more than 600 outlets. All that destruction occurred without the threat of a dangerous virus.

    In the months ahead, there will be restaurants and bars that survive and flourish like oases in the desert. But surrounding them will be a lot of sand.

    Column: A restaurant rebound is not on the table

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #10 - May 25th, 2020, 1:42 pm
    Post #10 - May 25th, 2020, 1:42 pm Post #10 - May 25th, 2020, 1:42 pm
    I just saw the outdoors restaurant guidelines which are going to take effect when outdoor dining becomes available on 5/29 in most of the state. They are not going to allow more than 6 people seated at a table, and the servers will have to wear masks, and they are not allowed to give refills on beverages. I can understand coffee, but I wonder if that includes water too? They must sanitize the table and chairs after they become vacant before more customers are seated at that table.

    I think I will not eat in a restaurant again until we hit stage 5, which will be at least 6 months.
  • Post #11 - May 25th, 2020, 2:33 pm
    Post #11 - May 25th, 2020, 2:33 pm Post #11 - May 25th, 2020, 2:33 pm
    Some friends were in Cleveland -- where restaurants have re-opened -- over the weekend and reported that it was kind of eerie (as opposed to Erie). Places were as full as they could be with seating capacities reduced, while others waited outside eateries for tables.

    They thought the use of standard, reusable menus by the restaurant was a careless oversight and they were uncomfortable with it. Rather than single-use, disposable menus, the restaurant was using standard, multi-use printed menus and did not appear to be cleaning or sanitizing them between uses. As the menus were taken away, bread, intended to be torn by hand, was brought to the table. My friends said they passed on the bread, not wanting to go at it directly after having handled the menus, though they must done something to disinfect their hands before eating their actual meal.

    Seems to me there are a lot of points at which the protocols could break down, leaving diners and employees vulnerable to infection. But I'm more than happy to have other states guinea-pigging it for the rest of us.

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #12 - May 25th, 2020, 3:22 pm
    Post #12 - May 25th, 2020, 3:22 pm Post #12 - May 25th, 2020, 3:22 pm
    ronnie_suburban wrote:Some friends were in Cleveland -- where restaurants have re-opened -- over the weekend and reported that it was kind of eerie (as opposed to Erie). Places were as full as they could be with seating capacities reduced, while others waited outside eateries for tables.

    They thought the use of standard, reusable menus by the restaurant was a careless oversight and they were uncomfortable with it. Rather than single-use, disposable menus, the restaurant was using standard, multi-use printed menus and did not appear to be cleaning or sanitizing them between uses. As the menus were taken away, bread, intended to be torn by hand, was brought to the table. My friends said they passed on the bread, not wanting to go at it directly after having handled the menus, though they must done something to disinfect their hands before eating their actual meal.

    Seems to me there are a lot of points at which the protocols could break down, leaving diners and employees vulnerable to infection. But I'm more than happy to have other states guinea-pigging it for the rest of us.

    =R=

    So these people were willing to travel to Cleveland, go out in public, pass by people they don't know, touch restaurant door handles, sit in an enclosed space with people they don't know (albeit presumably six feet apart), touch chairs and tables and tablecloths, eat food prepared by people they can't see and know nothing about, and eat food served by people they know nothing about, but draw the line at the possibility that another diner's virus got on the menu they touched and that they could get the virus by touching bread they would then eat?

    Times are different and scary, but that's an incredibly curious line to draw, especially when there's no known cases of transmission through eating and there is skepticism that it's possible.
  • Post #13 - May 25th, 2020, 3:37 pm
    Post #13 - May 25th, 2020, 3:37 pm Post #13 - May 25th, 2020, 3:37 pm
    MarlaCollins'Husband wrote:
    ronnie_suburban wrote:Some friends were in Cleveland -- where restaurants have re-opened -- over the weekend and reported that it was kind of eerie (as opposed to Erie). Places were as full as they could be with seating capacities reduced, while others waited outside eateries for tables.

    They thought the use of standard, reusable menus by the restaurant was a careless oversight and they were uncomfortable with it. Rather than single-use, disposable menus, the restaurant was using standard, multi-use printed menus and did not appear to be cleaning or sanitizing them between uses. As the menus were taken away, bread, intended to be torn by hand, was brought to the table. My friends said they passed on the bread, not wanting to go at it directly after having handled the menus, though they must done something to disinfect their hands before eating their actual meal.

    Seems to me there are a lot of points at which the protocols could break down, leaving diners and employees vulnerable to infection. But I'm more than happy to have other states guinea-pigging it for the rest of us.

    =R=

    So these people were willing to travel to Cleveland, go out in public, pass by people they don't know, touch restaurant door handles, sit in an enclosed space with people they don't know (albeit presumably six feet apart), touch chairs and tables and tablecloths, eat food prepared by people they can't see and know nothing about, and eat food served by people they know nothing about, but draw the line at the possibility that another diner's virus got on the menu they touched and that they could get the virus by touching bread they would then eat?

    Times are different and scary, but that's an incredibly curious line to draw, especially when there's no known cases of transmission through eating and there is skepticism that it's possible.

    I think they were mainly irked that it was such an obvious fumble in an area of risk that could have been more easily managed or eliminated all together. Hell, put up a chalk board (or a few) that can be read from anywhere in the dining room. Of course, they knew they were assuming some risk by dining out but when the restaurant did that, it was a glaring misstep, and one that was hard to ignore. But I didn't get the entire play-by-play from them, only some of the highlights, so please don't interpret my post as a comprehensive summary of their experience.

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #14 - May 25th, 2020, 3:42 pm
    Post #14 - May 25th, 2020, 3:42 pm Post #14 - May 25th, 2020, 3:42 pm
    NFriday wrote:They are not going to allow more than 6 people seated at a table, and the servers will have to wear masks, and they are not allowed to give refills on beverages. I can understand coffee, but I wonder if that includes water too?
    The refill restriction doesn't make any sense to me. What the hell is the difference btwn a refill and them bringing you another of the same drink. Coffee and water are the only thing I can think of this applying to, since soft drink refills are already done in the form of bringing a newly filled glass. What is the difference between pouring more water in the same glass and pouring water into a new glass? This is more about creating the illusion of a new profound sanitization, rather than actually doing so.
  • Post #15 - May 25th, 2020, 3:45 pm
    Post #15 - May 25th, 2020, 3:45 pm Post #15 - May 25th, 2020, 3:45 pm
    bweiny wrote:
    NFriday wrote:They are not going to allow more than 6 people seated at a table, and the servers will have to wear masks, and they are not allowed to give refills on beverages. I can understand coffee, but I wonder if that includes water too?
    The refill restriction doesn't make any sense to me. What the hell is the difference btwn a refill and them bringing you another of the same drink. Coffee and water are the only thing I can think of this applying to, since soft drink refills are already done in the form of bringing a newly filled glass. What is the difference between pouring more water in the same glass and pouring water into a new glass? This is more about creating the illusion of a new profound sanitization, rather than actually doing so.

    Even pre-pandemic I've regularly noticed -- and been grossed out by -- incompetent and careless servers who manage to dip the lip of pitcher, carafe or othe serving vessel into a customer's glass, mug or cup. Given this, it's quite easy to see why 'no refills' makes sense.

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #16 - May 25th, 2020, 3:52 pm
    Post #16 - May 25th, 2020, 3:52 pm Post #16 - May 25th, 2020, 3:52 pm
    I suspect when fast food chains such as McDonalds open up their restaurants, that they will not be allowed to operate the soft drink dispensers, which means that people will not be able to get refills on their soft drinks. Just like all drinking fountains in grocery stores are closed off.
  • Post #17 - May 25th, 2020, 4:06 pm
    Post #17 - May 25th, 2020, 4:06 pm Post #17 - May 25th, 2020, 4:06 pm
    ronnie_suburban wrote:
    bweiny wrote:What the hell is the difference btwn a refill and them bringing you another of the same drink. Coffee and water are the only thing I can think of this applying to, since soft drink refills are already done in the form of bringing a newly filled glass. What is the difference between pouring more water in the same glass and pouring water into a new glass?
    Even pre-pandemic I've regularly noticed -- and been grossed out by -- incompetent and careless servers who manage to dip the lip of pitcher, carafe or othe serving vessel into a customer's glass, mug or cup. Given this, it's quite easy to see why 'no refills' makes sense.
    What is transmitted on the lip of a pitcher, carafe or other serving vessel? Are people drinking the virus in their water or coffee? Those same servers are will be more likely to do the same thing if it's not in front of the patrons. There's no change in the substance of what they're doing - pouring a liquid into a cup or glass. That's why I see it as more performance than substance.
  • Post #18 - May 25th, 2020, 4:10 pm
    Post #18 - May 25th, 2020, 4:10 pm Post #18 - May 25th, 2020, 4:10 pm
    bweiny wrote:
    ronnie_suburban wrote:
    bweiny wrote:What the hell is the difference btwn a refill and them bringing you another of the same drink. Coffee and water are the only thing I can think of this applying to, since soft drink refills are already done in the form of bringing a newly filled glass. What is the difference between pouring more water in the same glass and pouring water into a new glass?
    Even pre-pandemic I've regularly noticed -- and been grossed out by -- incompetent and careless servers who manage to dip the lip of pitcher, carafe or othe serving vessel into a customer's glass, mug or cup. Given this, it's quite easy to see why 'no refills' makes sense.
    What is transmitted on the lip of a pitcher, carafe or other serving vessel? Are people drinking the virus in their water or coffee? Those same servers are will be more likely to do the same thing if it's not in front of the patrons. There's no change in the substance of what they're doing - pouring a liquid into a cup or glass. That's why I see it as more performance than substance.

    Saliva is on the customers' glasses and in the customers' beverages. The pitcher touches the inside of a glass. Now, that saliva is on the pitcher, ready for distribution to everyone else in the restaurant whose glass is filled from it. You're right that this could also happen out of view but you're not making a solid argument that restaurants should be re-opening anytime soon.

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #19 - May 25th, 2020, 4:36 pm
    Post #19 - May 25th, 2020, 4:36 pm Post #19 - May 25th, 2020, 4:36 pm
    ronnie_suburban wrote:
    bweiny wrote:What is transmitted on the lip of a pitcher, carafe or other serving vessel? Are people drinking the virus in their water or coffee? Those same servers are will be more likely to do the same thing if it's not in front of the patrons. There's no change in the substance of what they're doing - pouring a liquid into a cup or glass. That's why I see it as more performance than substance.
    Saliva is on the customers' glasses and in the customers' beverages. The pitcher touches the inside of a glass. Now, that saliva is on the pitcher, ready for distribution to everyone else in the restaurant whose glass is filled from it. You're right that this could also happen out of view but you're not making a solid argument that restaurants should be re-opening anytime soon.
    I'm not trying to make an argument about whether there should be mass reopenings of restaurants. Just that putting out blanket rules, without a specific guidance and intensive enforcement, which are nearly impossible, is mainly about optics. Your point about serving vessel picking up some amount saliva is appreciated. I just think that emphasizing this unlikely potential transmission is selective when others just as likely aren't addressed. I'm not advocating reopening at all. Moreso that people who are truly worried about dining out, not interpret these type of rules as more curative than they actually are.
  • Post #20 - May 25th, 2020, 5:32 pm
    Post #20 - May 25th, 2020, 5:32 pm Post #20 - May 25th, 2020, 5:32 pm
    bweiny wrote:
    ronnie_suburban wrote:
    bweiny wrote:What is transmitted on the lip of a pitcher, carafe or other serving vessel? Are people drinking the virus in their water or coffee? Those same servers are will be more likely to do the same thing if it's not in front of the patrons. There's no change in the substance of what they're doing - pouring a liquid into a cup or glass. That's why I see it as more performance than substance.
    Saliva is on the customers' glasses and in the customers' beverages. The pitcher touches the inside of a glass. Now, that saliva is on the pitcher, ready for distribution to everyone else in the restaurant whose glass is filled from it. You're right that this could also happen out of view but you're not making a solid argument that restaurants should be re-opening anytime soon.
    I'm not trying to make an argument about whether there should be mass reopenings of restaurants. Just that putting out blanket rules, without a specific guidance and intensive enforcement, which are nearly impossible, is mainly about optics. Your point about serving vessel picking up some amount saliva is appreciated. I just think that emphasizing this unlikely potential transmission is selective when others just as likely aren't addressed. I'm not advocating reopening at all. Moreso that people who are truly worried about dining out, not interpret these type of rules as more curative than they actually are.

    Agreed. I just picked up on the point about refills because it had been made above and it was just one thread -- of many -- that could be easily pulled to unravel this.

    Like probably a lot of us, I'm not even sure where I stand on restaurant/bar re-openings. Or better put, my opinion is constantly changing. Yes, I'm growing impatient and a bit stir-crazy with the closures but even if everything were open, I wouldn't be eagerly heading out to eat or drink in the near future. This is a classic case of Man vs. Nature and in such instances, Nature usually wins . . . at least for a while.

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #21 - May 26th, 2020, 9:57 am
    Post #21 - May 26th, 2020, 9:57 am Post #21 - May 26th, 2020, 9:57 am
    Hombre de Acero wrote:Yesterday- I saw The Future of Post Covid 19 eateries.


    The original:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaXayh1L45c
  • Post #22 - Yesterday, 12:45 pm
    Post #22 - Yesterday, 12:45 pm Post #22 - Yesterday, 12:45 pm
    The painful arithmetic of making up lost revenue for Chicago-area restaurants will not abate in June — even if reopening plans move forward in the coming month — but some makeshift solutions are drawing ire from already shrunken customer bases.

    Lettuce Entertain You, the city’s largest restaurant group with 85 restaurants across Chicagoland, recently added a 4% surcharge to delivery and carryout orders.

    https://www.chicagotribune.com/coronavi ... story.html
    Never order barbecue in a place that also serves quiche - Lewis Grizzard
  • Post #23 - Yesterday, 2:17 pm
    Post #23 - Yesterday, 2:17 pm Post #23 - Yesterday, 2:17 pm
    With respect to LEY adding a 4% surcharge, I have absolutely no problem with this. It's less than the tip one would leave to a server. I feel like tipping the people in grocery stores, quite frankly, as I'm doing more prepared food than restaurant food during the confinement. If I get curb-side carryout, I over-tip. I have no idea how individual restaurants are doling out the tips. I hope they're sharing with everyone.

    This is a bit off topic, but I had a client early into the confinement tell me that the restaurant where he worked had kept on the undocumented workers to work in the kitchen for carry-out, as they had no other options. US citizens can collect unemployment and qualify for the relief payment. I thought this was an honorable solution, setting aside the fact that they had undocumented employees to begin with. Fact is, people are here, they are (were) working, and deserve to be treated with dignity and compassion.

    Did you all know that if a US citizen, married to an undocumented person, filing a joint tax return with an ITIN (as legally required -- doing the right thing under the circumstances and tax law), do NOT qualify for the relief payments? Not the $1,200 they would get if they filed an incorrect tax return as head of household. Not a dime for their American citizen children? That ain't right. But that's the law.

Contact

About

Team

Advertize

Close

Chat

Articles

Guide

Events

more