LTH Home

Milk chocolate and semi sweet chocolate: Are they the same?

Milk chocolate and semi sweet chocolate: Are they the same?
  • Forum HomePost Reply BackTop
  • Milk chocolate and semi sweet chocolate: Are they the same?

    Post #1 - December 11th, 2004, 8:07 pm
    Post #1 - December 11th, 2004, 8:07 pm Post #1 - December 11th, 2004, 8:07 pm
    Attempting to make chocolate chip cookies, but realized that I bought milk chocolate chips instead of semisweet chocolate chips... If I go ahead and use the milk chocolate chips, should I decrease the amount of sugar? Recipe is calling for 3/4 cup each of brown and white sugar....

    Help??

    PS I tried the Gingersnap cookie recipe here and it is actually pretty good...
  • Post #2 - December 11th, 2004, 8:13 pm
    Post #2 - December 11th, 2004, 8:13 pm Post #2 - December 11th, 2004, 8:13 pm
    HI,

    Milk Chocolate chips is 1:1 exchange for the bittersweet chips, no need to adjust anything else in the recipe. You will simply have a different tasting cookie.

    You're becoming quite the baker C!
    Cathy2

    "You'll be remembered long after you're dead if you make good gravy, mashed potatoes and biscuits." -- Nathalie Dupree
    Facebook, Twitter, Greater Midwest Foodways, Road Food 2012: Podcast
  • Post #3 - December 11th, 2004, 8:34 pm
    Post #3 - December 11th, 2004, 8:34 pm Post #3 - December 11th, 2004, 8:34 pm
    I knew you would come to my rescue...

    Yes, my foray into pies has taken a detour to cookies... I tried calling you last night to see if I could substitute waxed paper for parchment paper... Well, at least now I know I shouldn't if I do not want to wash partially melted wax off my cookie sheets... =)
  • Post #4 - July 7th, 2020, 10:19 pm
    Post #4 - July 7th, 2020, 10:19 pm Post #4 - July 7th, 2020, 10:19 pm
    Is there a standard of identity for semi sweet chocolate? For example, is a chocolate that contains 55% cocoa solids considered semi sweet? Or do other attributes determine whether or not a chocolate is semi sweet? In the end, I'm not sure it really matters in practical terms. If I'm going to bake with a chocolate I like, it really doesn't matter what it can or cannot legally be called. But just for reference, I'd like to know what exactly it is that defines semi sweet.

    Thanks,

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #5 - July 7th, 2020, 11:10 pm
    Post #5 - July 7th, 2020, 11:10 pm Post #5 - July 7th, 2020, 11:10 pm
    HI,

    When I buy baking chocolate, I always buy unsweetened. It is cheaper to add sugar than to pay for the sugar already added to the chocolate.

    You may want to consult this Cook's Illustrated article on How to substitute chocolates.

    Regards,
    Cathy2
    Cathy2

    "You'll be remembered long after you're dead if you make good gravy, mashed potatoes and biscuits." -- Nathalie Dupree
    Facebook, Twitter, Greater Midwest Foodways, Road Food 2012: Podcast
  • Post #6 - July 7th, 2020, 11:15 pm
    Post #6 - July 7th, 2020, 11:15 pm Post #6 - July 7th, 2020, 11:15 pm
    Cathy2 wrote:HI,

    When I buy baking chocolate, I always buy unsweetened. It is cheaper to add sugar than to pay for the sugar already added to the chocolate.

    You may want to consult this Cook's Illustrated article on How to substitute chocolates.

    Thank you. That is generally useful but in the case of baking with chocolate chips (and wanting the chips to stay in chip form in the finished product), it wouldn't be applicable. Do you know what range of cocoa solids are considered to be semi sweet when it comes to baking chips? Again, I realize that this is probably more a matter of personal taste than anything else but I am curious. I seriously doubt that using any chips, especially ones you already know you like, is going to ruin a recipe.

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #7 - July 8th, 2020, 5:06 am
    Post #7 - July 8th, 2020, 5:06 am Post #7 - July 8th, 2020, 5:06 am
    Hey Ronnie,

    I'm not aware of a specific delineation for semisweet chocolate. There is a semi-specific standard for bittersweet chocolate - above 59/60% cacao - so I've always called anything under that percentage, but without milk solids, semisweet chocolate. If a chocolate has milk solids, it's automatically a milk chocolate. If it is darker than 40%, the term "deep milk" or "dark milk" is typically used.

    For chocolate chips in recipes, they're probably fairly equivalent (maybe even if melted) as they have stabilizers added to them.

    It's funny how much chocolate percentages can range. Hersheys special dark is sweeter than many high-end semisweet chocolates. (The internet just told me it's actually 45%).

    Best,
    Katherine
    Katherine

    Everyone has a price: mine is chocolate.
  • Post #8 - July 8th, 2020, 9:20 am
    Post #8 - July 8th, 2020, 9:20 am Post #8 - July 8th, 2020, 9:20 am
    Katherine_84f wrote:Hey Ronnie,

    I'm not aware of a specific delineation for semisweet chocolate. There is a semi-specific standard for bittersweet chocolate - above 59/60% cacao - so I've always called anything under that percentage, but without milk solids, semisweet chocolate. If a chocolate has milk solids, it's automatically a milk chocolate. If it is darker than 40%, the term "deep milk" or "dark milk" is typically used.

    For chocolate chips in recipes, they're probably fairly equivalent (maybe even if melted) as they have stabilizers added to them.

    It's funny how much chocolate percentages can range. Hersheys special dark is sweeter than many high-end semisweet chocolates. (The internet just told me it's actually 45%).

    Thanks, Katherine. This is super helpful. Some producers are very transparent with their cocoa solids percentages, while others seem to intentionally hide the information. That just makes comparisons and decisions even harder. I'm going to start by using what I have on hand and cross my fingers that the universe doesn't implode! :lol:

    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #9 - July 8th, 2020, 9:37 am
    Post #9 - July 8th, 2020, 9:37 am Post #9 - July 8th, 2020, 9:37 am
    ronnie_suburban wrote:
    ... I'm going to start by using what I have on hand and cross my fingers that the universe doesn't implode! :lol:

    The universe is in favor of any chocolate. You'll be fine. :D
    -Mary
  • Post #10 - July 31st, 2020, 11:59 pm
    Post #10 - July 31st, 2020, 11:59 pm Post #10 - July 31st, 2020, 11:59 pm
    A very entertaining and informative video on tempering chocolate from Babish . . .



    =R=
    By protecting others, you save yourself. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself. --Kambei Shimada

    Every human interaction is an opportunity for disappointment --RS

    There's a horse loose in a hospital --JM

    That don't impress me much --Shania Twain
  • Post #11 - August 6th, 2020, 5:24 pm
    Post #11 - August 6th, 2020, 5:24 pm Post #11 - August 6th, 2020, 5:24 pm
    The GP wrote:
    ronnie_suburban wrote:
    ... I'm going to start by using what I have on hand and cross my fingers that the universe doesn't implode! :lol:

    The universe is in favor of any chocolate. You'll be fine. :D


    This reminds me of a strange occurrence my sophomore year at Knox college. I was in the union game room late on a Saturday afternoon when a feckless freshman we called “Leech” was playing off the extra games we had left on one of the pinball machines.

    As was his wont, he got mad at a bad play and kicked the machine “right in the D. Gottlieb”. This was not a love tap, but a vicious thrust so that rather than the game reporting a tilt, it turned off the playing field and lit up “Game Over” on the back flash.

    At virtually the same time, power went out not only in the building, but over the entire campus. It seemed that Leech had committed something much worse than a Game Over, but had perhaps instigated a World Over.

    As you should know, simultaneity does not imply causality. In this case, it was not the kick that turned off the campus, but a lighting strike from the violent storm that was going on at the time. It was the desire to watch the storm that prompted us (the pinball mafia) to abandon the game in the first place.

    The moral of the story is that if the universe is destroyed while you are indiscriminately mixing chocolates, it’s just a coincidence.

    It turns out that among the possible endings of the universe we know of only one that could be prompted by a localized event. While it does not result in an implosion, the vacuum decay of the universe comes pretty close to being one.

    https://bigthink.com/surprising-science ... belltitem4
  • Post #12 - August 6th, 2020, 6:02 pm
    Post #12 - August 6th, 2020, 6:02 pm Post #12 - August 6th, 2020, 6:02 pm
    scottsol wrote:As you should know, simultaneity does not imply causality.

    Geeesh, settle down. If I wanted to think I’d watch Dr. Phil.
    One minute to Wapner.
    Raymond Babbitt

    Low & Slow
  • Post #13 - August 6th, 2020, 6:06 pm
    Post #13 - August 6th, 2020, 6:06 pm Post #13 - August 6th, 2020, 6:06 pm
    G Wiv wrote:
    scottsol wrote:As you should know, simultaneity does not imply causality.

    Geeesh, settle down. If I wanted to think I’d watch Dr. Phil.


    If watching Dr. Phil prompts you to think, you have much bigger problems than having to read my posts.
  • Post #14 - August 6th, 2020, 6:29 pm
    Post #14 - August 6th, 2020, 6:29 pm Post #14 - August 6th, 2020, 6:29 pm
    scottsol wrote:If watching Dr. Phil prompts you to think, you have much bigger problems than having to read my posts.

    Don’t be dissing Dr. Phil. He’s buds with the great and all powerful O. Blessed be her name.
    One minute to Wapner.
    Raymond Babbitt

    Low & Slow
  • Post #15 - August 6th, 2020, 8:37 pm
    Post #15 - August 6th, 2020, 8:37 pm Post #15 - August 6th, 2020, 8:37 pm
    When she moved out of Chicago she ceased to exist.
  • Post #16 - August 6th, 2020, 9:55 pm
    Post #16 - August 6th, 2020, 9:55 pm Post #16 - August 6th, 2020, 9:55 pm
    scottsol wrote:When she moved out of Chicago she ceased to exist.

    An atheist? You probably don't live in a foxhole.
    One minute to Wapner.
    Raymond Babbitt

    Low & Slow
  • Post #17 - August 6th, 2020, 11:35 pm
    Post #17 - August 6th, 2020, 11:35 pm Post #17 - August 6th, 2020, 11:35 pm
    G Wiv wrote:
    scottsol wrote:When she moved out of Chicago she ceased to exist.

    An atheist? You probably don't live in a foxhole.


    No, a solipsist.

Contact

About

Team

Advertize

Close

Chat

Articles

Guide

Events

more