With
Noma closing I've seen a few
ruminations on its potential as a bellwether (or death knell) for the evolution of the $400 tasting menu with its requisite gauntlet of butt-numbing seats, medieval litany of courses,
asinine serving vessels, and conspicuous consumption.
As chef René Redzepi told the NYT, “It’s unsustainable...Financially and emotionally, as an employer and as a human being, it just doesn’t work.”
The Menu, for all of its
de rigueur dialogue flaws, does have its finger on the cold aesthetic. (I feel like I've been served personally by the Elsa character, best performance in the film).
In the same breath / bite, bespoke
omakase seems like it is on the rise. And in October this past year, we ate at
Owamni in the Twin Cities (review forthcoming), where you're encouraged to build your own tasting, prices are kept bracingly reasonable, and non-reservable terrace seats are maintained for all days in the hopes that patrons, especially from the communities the kitchen represents, will come to enjoy on an impromptu basis without the barrier-to-entry of a six-month reservation lead time. It has been heralded as the finest restaurant in the country. I might be on board with that appellation.
LTH has always embraced both the mom-and-pop and chef-auteur-session models. For the futurists out there, do you think the Noma closure will be just a blip on the radar, or are other Michelin multi-stars an endangered species this next decade? Are we moving as a society past gels and tweezers, or are they ossifying the way
Ivy Style has, and we'll be looking at the same upper tier dining room format in 2089 as 1989? And can anyone get me a reservation at
Dorsia?
Le Trott' est mort, vive le Trott'!