tonyd wrote:do cafeterias still exist in the loop, and do you guys remember stop and shop? any good joints to be had for a quick bite?
stevez wrote:However, the best example of an old time cafeteria still in existance near downtown is Manny's. Everything else is not even in the same league.
Bob S. wrote:
The Equitable building (401 N Michigan) also has a food court with some steam tables -- their stunningly ugly site is at http://www.bistro401.com.
stevez wrote:Bob S. wrote:The Equitable building (401 N Michigan) also has a food court with some steam tables -- their stunningly ugly site is at http://www.bistro401.com.
Ugly, yes...but some of the selections on the lunch menu for this week are at least ambitious. (dishes like lamb curry, cornish game hen over spinach, etc. and a full selection of sandwiches and wraps). If they follow up the menu with well executed food, it sounds like it could be a good alternative.
JimInLoganSquare wrote: The signature piece is of course top-flight fried chicken (NOTE: always pan fried; the deep fried version so prevalent in these parts like Hecky's, ECS, Harold's, etc. is O.K. in a pinch but is really just an inferior product, and wouldn't be suffered at even a mediocre Indiana cafeteria).
David Hammond wrote:I had no idea cafeterias were so distinctly Indianian. Gives me yet one more reason, besides Binion's Horseshoe (which does have a cafeteria-like restaurant on the boat), to visit.
Hammond
JimInLoganSquare wrote:Sure, David -- Pan fried chicken is superior to deep fried chicken for a couple of reasons. Mainly, the difference is that pan fried chicken is attentatively watched and tended by the cook throughout the cooking process, meaning each piece gets cooked just right. Chicken is an oddly shaped mass; if chicken were in perfect spheres, then deep frying it would reliably produce ideal results every time. However, each actual (once living and breathing) chicken is unevenly warfed, meaning only the hand and eye coordination (and constant attention) of a pan-frying chef will result in proper overall cooking. When you just throw it in a vat of hot oil, the thinner parts and parts nearer the tips of the bones get overcooked, while the remainder just gets nominally cooked/heated through. You really need to toss the chicken around in the pan quite a bit to make it cook up right.
Christopher Gordon wrote:I grew up visiting Luby's cafeteria chain in Houston; at least as many items, if not more, than the so-called "world's largest cafeteria" in Indiana-puhleeze.
JimInLoganSquare wrote:Sure, David -- Pan fried chicken is superior to deep fried chicken for a couple of reasons. Mainly, the difference is that pan fried chicken is attentatively watched and tended by the cook throughout the cooking process, meaning each piece gets cooked just right. .
David Hammond wrote:JimInLoganSquare wrote:Sure, David -- Pan fried chicken is superior to deep fried chicken for a couple of reasons. Mainly, the difference is that pan fried chicken is attentatively watched and tended by the cook throughout the cooking process, meaning each piece gets cooked just right. Chicken is an oddly shaped mass; if chicken were in perfect spheres, then deep frying it would reliably produce ideal results every time. However, each actual (once living and breathing) chicken is unevenly warfed, meaning only the hand and eye coordination (and constant attention) of a pan-frying chef will result in proper overall cooking. When you just throw it in a vat of hot oil, the thinner parts and parts nearer the tips of the bones get overcooked, while the remainder just gets nominally cooked/heated through. You really need to toss the chicken around in the pan quite a bit to make it cook up right.
JILS,
That makes perfect sense. Of course, to do the pan fry right, as you say, requires steady monitoring and ministration (which could not always be guaranteed), but with a deep fryer, you have no choice: some meat will be overcooked and some undercooked (a significant problem with poultry).
Hammond
JimInLoganSquare wrote:Of course Manny's is (at least for many) the ultimate cafeteria in Chicago, and smorgasbords like Red Apple are ubiquitous here, but generally speaking, most of the rest of the world outside Indiana just doesn't get cafeterias. A cafeteria is a very long line of steam tables. The cafeteria is probably the Hoosier state's signature contribution to the American epicurean scene, and I say this without even a hint of irony. Indiana cafeterias (1) serve extraordinarily good food and (2) are unequalled outside the state line (and I know this having tried quite a few of those cafeterias south of the Mason Dixon line, where they also are quite popular...and don't measure up). Growing up in Indianapolis (as disconnected as that urban center is from the Hoosier majority), we ate every Sunday post-church meal (and sometimes a weekday dinner as well) at a cafeteria (Laughner's (founded 1900), MCL or one of the many independents). The signature piece is of course top-flight fried chicken (NOTE: always pan fried; the deep fried version so prevalent in these parts like Hecky's, ECS, Harold's, etc. is O.K. in a pinch but is really just an inferior product, and wouldn't be suffered at even a mediocre Indiana cafeteria). The second signature piece is delicious pie. In about 1,879 varieties, each one better than the last. Good pie is a lost art; you hardly ever see it as a dessert, except at goddawful places like Baker's Square. But the art of the pie has not died in Indiana, and the cafeteria is the place to get it.