Vada or vadai should be a tasty savory doughnut, with crisp crunchy exterior having come out of the deep frier and a soft steaming interior. It should be good on its own or maybe with a bit of pickle (of Indian vegetable and spices variety), and not need sambar or chutney. However, it is also very good eating broken up and soaked in the sambar. Sambar vadai is sometimes on menus. Another variant is vada served
Half-agree

Vadas, when good, should be fine on their own. But I personally
always have liked to have mine with chutney (and almost never sambar).
Not authentic, I know, but there *are* some of us who think they can go
pretty well with a decent chutney

soaked in yogurt - the savory, salty Thair Vada (Thair = yogurt; Tamil) which in adapted North Indian treatments is Dahi Vada (dahi = yogurt; Hindi,Gujrathi and many N. Indian languages) and is most often sweet (although not necessarily as much as a dessert)
Definitely not a dessert - and there was a mention of "dahi vada" in the latest
Hyderabad House thread IIRC.
rant warning
*The dosais were very good. My wife, irritated by the peas in the 'masala said, "How hard is it to make a dosa?" But it does require at least a proper batter and some skill/experience in spreading it and not having it stick on the pan. Although I did like the
I realized that this Udupi Palace was surely run by North Indians and this is very sadly yet another Indian establishment that is less than authentic in its food (I can't really care less who runs it or who cooks).
If you ask the average N. Indian to name S. Indian foods, you will most likely hear as an answer, "Dosa, sambar, iddly". These breakfast/snack/meal time foods from the south are very popular all over India, unlike the multitude of dishes and especially the non-vegetarian cuisine that remain regional specialties and unknown to the general populace beyond a small border. Thus this meal was for us very slanted - a N. Indian interpretation of what the kitchen/management thinks will pass as S. Indian fare.
Did I mention we really liked the Papri Chaat. Guess which part of India that is from?
end rant.
Dont want to defend Udipi per se - used to be a regular there 6-8 years ago, but
have hardly been there a couple of times in the past year or two, and have no
real comment on the current food. However...
I do think you are being a touch harsh above. Udipi has, from the first day
it arrived in Chicago, been *owned* by a North Indian. However, it was always
*run* by South Indians, and they had authentic Tamilian cooks (Ive had friends
who went into the kitchen and chatted in Tamil to make sure

- this was a
long time ago however). It is unfair to just label it an inauthentic North Indians
view of South Indian food - again, I have not been much lately and so will
offer no comment (you might well be correct on the current state), but it
was *very* authentic Tamilian food for its first few years. There used to
be long queues of Tamilians lined up on weekends in the early days -
and Ive been there with several Tamilians, all of whom were very high on
it in the early days. In fact it was good for South Indian food in general -
a Kannadiga I went with once was happy enough with his bisibele baath,
for example (again, this was maybe 5 years ago).
The above comment about "how hard is it to make a dosa" ... for
those of us who are poor cooks, it is *very* hard

Actually, anyone who
has made several dosas at home knows it is hard to make many - the
hotter the pan gets, the more difficult it is to get it nice and crisp and keep
em coming etc.
The reason I bring this up is, I remember the state of authentic South Indian
food in Chicago *before* Udipi. There was none - the only dosas etc you got
*were* at North Indian snack spots. And they were poor, the "floppy
dosa" types (this is never good, but may be somewhat tolerable if youre
going with a masala dosa, ie with fillings. Me, I only go with a "Plain
Paper Dosa" - and if thats floppy, you might as well not eat at all. And I
never once found one unfloppy in Chicago, ever, before Uditpi). Then
Udipi arrived, and it was quite literally a revolution - suddenly, for the
first time ever, there was authentic South Indian food in Chicago, cooked
by honest-to-goodness Tamilians (even if the waitresses were Russian
And it became the most popular Indian restaurant in town. South Indians would
line up on weekends - waits were on occasino an hour, unheard of for
an Indian restaurant in those days. Even non-South-Indians, hearing tales
of properly authentic South Indian food, came in droves. No authentic
South Indian restaurant had existed in Chicago before - and suddenly it
was clear to everyone that there *was* actually a market for it (before
that, it was all "Mughlai" joints, and nothing else - presumably nobody
thought there was a market for anything else).
Then, of course, everything changed - Dasaprakash opened, then
Mysore Woodlands, and now there are South Indian restaurants even in the
suburbs. There is no monopoly anymore (and in the last 4/5 years Ive been
more to Mysore Woodlands than Udipi - started going there when it opened
mostly because the South Indian manager of Udipi, a good guy we knew
well, was not treated very well at Udipi and so left and started managing
Mysore Woodlands, and many of us customers moved with him). Ive
bareldy been to Udipi in the last few years - and thus, again, I have no
wish to disagree with you or defend its cookign at the moment.
But, given the past, I did want to point out that the above was probably too
harsh. Maybe Udipi isnt authentic now, I dont know - but I do know that
it *was* authentic once. It was a trailblazer, the first authentic regional
Indian restaurant in Chicago- and was a damn fine veggie restaurant
in general (this coming from someone who struggles with veggie
restaurants in general - with their idlis, their paper dosas, and their
best-in-town-in-those-days bhatura in their channa-bhatura, even us
habitual meat-eaters were happy enough there). For that much at least
it deserves *some* credit IMHO - and doesnt deserve to be dismissed
merely as a restaurant with "North Indian style South Indian food".
We did finish the afternoon on a sweet note at
Ambala. I'll add a note in that thread.
Ah good - will look forward to it. Did a trip to Tahoora for its savouries a short
while ago mysel - and while Tahoora's savouries are probably still better
than Ambala's (or at least more suited to the style Iam used to), they are
not what they used to be either. I remember Tahoora's usual savouries
being clearly better a couple of years ago than they are today - but they
have done so well recently that they will soon be moving across the
street to what appears to be a massive place. (They seem *far* busier
than Ambala, for example, even though IMHO Ambala clearly has the
better sweets).
c8w